Thermal conductivity for metals, polymers, fluids and gases — in W/m·K and imperial units, from silver at 429 down to air at 0.026.
Page last changed 2026-10-19 · based on n/a — physical property data, no governing revision
| Material[2] | Conductivity W/m·K[2] | Conductivity BTU·in/h·ft²·°F[1] | Class[2] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silver # | 429 | 2971 | Metal |
| Copper # | 401 | 2777 | Metal |
| Gold # | 317 | 2196 | Metal |
| Aluminium # | 237 | 1642 | Metal |
| Brass (70/30) # | 110 | 762 | Metal |
| Nickel # | 90 | 623 | Metal |
| Iron, pure # | 80 | 554 | Metal |
| Steel, carbon 1% # | 43 | 298 | Metal |
| Lead # | 35 | 242 | Metal |
| Titanium # | 22 | 152 | Metal |
| Stainless 316 # | 16.3 | 113 | Metal |
| Stainless 304 # | 16.2 | 112 | Metal |
| Inconel 718 # | 11.4 | 79 | Metal |
| Glass, window # | 1.05 | 7.3 | Non-metal |
| Concrete # | 1.7 | 11.8 | Non-metal |
| Brick, common # | 0.6 | 4.2 | Non-metal |
| Water (20 °C) # | 0.6 | 4.2 | Fluid |
| Engine oil # | 0.145 | 1.0 | Fluid |
| PVC # | 0.19 | 1.3 | Polymer |
| PTFE # | 0.25 | 1.7 | Polymer |
| PEEK # | 0.25 | 1.7 | Polymer |
| Delrin (POM) # | 0.31 | 2.1 | Polymer |
| Wood, oak # | 0.17 | 1.2 | Non-metal |
| Air (20 °C) # | 0.026 | 0.18 | Gas |
Values are at approximately 20–25 °C. Thermal conductivity is temperature-dependent, and for alloys it also depends on composition and heat treatment — a specific grade's value should come from its own data sheet where precision matters.
Thermal conductivity k is the heat flow through a unit thickness for a unit temperature difference: W/m·K in metric, BTU·in/h·ft²·°F in imperial. The imperial unit contains inches rather than feet because conduction calculations usually involve a wall or sheet of known thickness in inches.
The two are not a simple ratio because of the inch in the imperial unit — the conversion factor is 6.933, not 5.678 (which is the factor for BTU·ft/h·ft²·°F).
The spread is enormous — four orders of magnitude from silver to air.
A practical consequence for machining: stainless steel, titanium and nickel alloys conduct heat away from the cutting edge poorly, so the heat stays in the tool. That is a large part of why they are difficult to machine.
References and calculation methods used for this page are listed below. Numbered markers connect table columns where present. A reference listing does not itself establish that every value has been independently checked.
| # | Source | Type | Revision / method |
|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | Imperial conversion | derived | W/m·K × 6.933 = BTU·in/h·ft²·°F (the inch-based form of the imperial unit). |
| [2] | Standard engineering handbook values (ASM Metals Reference Book and comparable sources) | reference | n/a — compiled physical property data, not a revisioned specification — source |
| Standard | Revision | What it covers on this page |
|---|---|---|
| Compiled engineering handbook values | n/a — physical property data, no governing revision | thermal conductivity values for all materials listed |
No page-specific independent source review is recorded here. The listed references and formulas explain the basis of the compilation; automated consistency checks do not verify the original sources or establish product conformity.
Derived values — the following values on this page are calculated, not taken directly from the standard:
| Value | How it is derived |
|---|---|
| Imperial conductivity column | W/m·K × 6.933. |
Values are typical room-temperature figures. Conductivity varies with temperature, and for alloys with composition and condition — use the specific grade data sheet where precision matters.
Read the source notes, calculation methods and verification scope above before reusing a value. To cite this page:
Each row in the tables above also has a permanent link — hover a row and use the # link to cite a single value rather than the whole page.
This site uses Google Analytics to count visits and see which pages are useful. It sets cookies only if you agree. See the privacy policy.