Thermal conductivity for metals, polymers, fluids and gases — in W/m·K and imperial units, from silver at 429 down to air at 0.026.
Data verified 2026-09-29 · based on n/a — physical property data, no governing revision
| Material[2] | Conductivity W/m·K[2] | Conductivity BTU·in/h·ft²·°F[1] | Class[2] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silver # | 429 | 2971 | Metal |
| Copper # | 401 | 2777 | Metal |
| Gold # | 317 | 2196 | Metal |
| Aluminium # | 237 | 1642 | Metal |
| Brass (70/30) # | 110 | 762 | Metal |
| Nickel # | 90 | 623 | Metal |
| Iron, pure # | 80 | 554 | Metal |
| Steel, carbon 1% # | 43 | 298 | Metal |
| Lead # | 35 | 242 | Metal |
| Titanium # | 22 | 152 | Metal |
| Stainless 316 # | 16.3 | 113 | Metal |
| Stainless 304 # | 16.2 | 112 | Metal |
| Inconel 718 # | 11.4 | 79 | Metal |
| Glass, window # | 1.05 | 7.3 | Non-metal |
| Concrete # | 1.7 | 11.8 | Non-metal |
| Brick, common # | 0.6 | 4.2 | Non-metal |
| Water (20 °C) # | 0.6 | 4.2 | Fluid |
| Engine oil # | 0.145 | 1.0 | Fluid |
| PVC # | 0.19 | 1.3 | Polymer |
| PTFE # | 0.25 | 1.7 | Polymer |
| PEEK # | 0.25 | 1.7 | Polymer |
| Delrin (POM) # | 0.31 | 2.1 | Polymer |
| Wood, oak # | 0.17 | 1.2 | Non-metal |
| Air (20 °C) # | 0.026 | 0.18 | Gas |
Values are at approximately 20–25 °C. Thermal conductivity is temperature-dependent, and for alloys it also depends on composition and heat treatment — a specific grade's value should come from its own data sheet where precision matters.
Thermal conductivity k is the heat flow through a unit thickness for a unit temperature difference: W/m·K in metric, BTU·in/h·ft²·°F in imperial. The imperial unit contains inches rather than feet because conduction calculations usually involve a wall or sheet of known thickness in inches.
The two are not a simple ratio because of the inch in the imperial unit — the conversion factor is 6.933, not 5.678 (which is the factor for BTU·ft/h·ft²·°F).
The spread is enormous — four orders of magnitude from silver to air.
A practical consequence for machining: stainless steel, titanium and nickel alloys conduct heat away from the cutting edge poorly, so the heat stays in the tool. That is a large part of why they are difficult to machine.
Each data column on this page is tied to the source it came from. The numbers in square brackets correspond to the table headers above.
| # | Source | Type | Revision / method |
|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | Imperial conversion | derived | W/m·K × 6.933 = BTU·in/h·ft²·°F (the inch-based form of the imperial unit). |
| [2] | Standard engineering handbook values (ASM Metals Reference Book and comparable sources) | standard | n/a — compiled physical property data, not a revisioned specification — source |
| Standard | Revision | What it covers on this page |
|---|---|---|
| Compiled engineering handbook values | n/a — physical property data, no governing revision | thermal conductivity values for all materials listed |
Cross-checked against:
Derived values — the following values on this page are calculated, not taken directly from the standard:
| Value | How it is derived |
|---|---|
| Imperial conductivity column | W/m·K × 6.933. |
Values are typical room-temperature figures. Conductivity varies with temperature, and for alloys with composition and condition — use the specific grade data sheet where precision matters.
Every value on this page is traceable to the sources listed above. If you use the data in a document, paper or report, cite it as:
Each row in the tables above also has a permanent link — hover a row and use the # link to cite a single value rather than the whole page.
This site uses Google Analytics to count visits and see which pages are useful. It sets cookies only if you agree. See the privacy policy.