Sources and scope for this page: Machinability rating, AISI 1112 = 100% (industry comparison scale with no single governing standard), covering all ratings, hardness values and roughing speeds on this page. No independent source check is recorded for this page: the content rests on the sources listed and on the working shown on the page. Full sources, values and limits on this page.
Page last changed 2026-11-08 · based on n/a — industry comparison scale with no single governing standard
Quick Answer
Machinability Ratings (AISI 1112 = 100%)
| Material[1] | Group[1] | Machinability[1] | Hardness[1] | Typical roughing[1] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminium 6061-T6 # | N | 300 % | 95 HB | 1,000–1,500 SFM |
| Brass 360 # | N | 300 % | 78 HRB | 600–1,000 SFM |
| Aluminium 5052 # | N | 250 % | 60 HB | 1,200–1,800 SFM |
| Aluminium 2024-T4 # | N | 200 % | 120 HB | 900–1,400 SFM |
| AISI 12L14 # | P | 170 % | 130 HB | 400–600 SFM |
| Aluminium 7075-T6 # | N | 150 % | 150 HB | 800–1,200 SFM |
| AISI 1018 # | P | 78 % | 126 HB | 300–400 SFM |
| AISI 303 # | M | 78 % | 160–200 HB | 250–350 SFM |
| AISI 1141 # | P | 72 % | 190–230 HB | 300–400 SFM |
| Gray Iron Class 30 # | K | 70 % | 187–241 HB | 250–400 SFM |
| AISI 8620 # | P | 66 % | 150–200 HB | 250–350 SFM |
| Ductile Iron 65-45-12 # | K | 60 % | 170–210 HB | 200–350 SFM |
| AISI 1045 # | P | 57 % | 170–210 HB | 250–350 SFM |
| AISI 4140 # | P | 56 % | 197–235 HB (annealed) | 200–300 SFM |
| AISI 4340 # | P | 50 % | 217–255 HB (annealed) | 180–280 SFM |
| 17-4 PH # | M | 48 % | 28–38 HRC | 120–200 SFM |
| AISI 304 # | M | 45 % | 170–200 HB | 100–150 SFM |
| H13 Tool Steel # | P | 45 % | 190–230 HB (annealed) | 150–250 SFM |
| O1 Tool Steel # | P | 42 % | 190–220 HB (annealed) | 150–250 SFM |
| AISI 52100 # | P | 40 % | 190–230 HB (spheroidised) | 150–250 SFM |
| AISI 440C # | M | 40 % | 56–60 HRC hardened | 100–180 SFM |
| D2 Tool Steel # | P | 38 % | 210–240 HB (annealed) | 120–200 SFM |
| AISI 316 # | M | 36 % | 170–210 HB | 80–120 SFM |
| Monel 400 # | S | 36 % | 120–150 HB | 120–200 SFM |
| Ti-6Al-4V # | S | 22 % | 33–36 HRC | 120–180 SFM |
| Copper C11000 # | N | 20 % | 45 HRB | 300–500 SFM |
| Inconel 625 # | S | 15 % | 30–35 HRC | 80–120 SFM |
| Inconel 718 # | S | 10 % | 38–42 HRC | 60–100 SFM |
Ratings compare how easily a material cuts, folding together chip formation, surface finish, tool wear and power consumption. Sources differ by roughly ±10%, because each was measured under different conditions. A high rating does not mean soft — gray cast iron rates 70% and cuts easily because the graphite breaks chips, while pure copper rates 20% and is soft but gummy.
What the Rating Is and Is Not
The scale is comparative and empirical. It was built from shop-floor measurements against a reference material, and it is not derived from any physical property — which is why you cannot compute it from hardness, and why two materials of similar hardness can rate very differently.
What it is good for: ranking candidate materials when choosing between them. What it is not good for: predicting a cutting speed. For that, use the individual material page, which gives speeds by operation, and your own tooling catalogue.
Material Groups
Alongside the rating, materials are classified into groups that describe machining behaviour. Insert grades are selected by group rather than by individual alloy:
- P — Steel, including alloy and tool steels. The largest group.
- M — Stainless steel, austenitic and duplex. Work-hardening.
- K — Cast iron. Graphite acts as a chip breaker, so it machines well despite hardness.
- N — Non-ferrous: aluminium, copper, brass. Fast cutting, gummy chips.
- S — Superalloys and titanium. Heat-resistant, work-hardening, the most difficult group.
- H — Hardened materials, above roughly 45 HRC.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is a machinability rating?
- A comparative percentage describing how easily a material can be cut, on a scale where AISI 1112 free-machining steel is 100%. It folds together chip formation, surface finish, tool wear and power consumption into one shop-floor number.
- Which metal is easiest to machine?
- Among common metals, free-cutting brass and aluminium 6061 rate highest at about 300% on this scale. Of steels, leaded 12L14 at 170% is the easiest. The ratings above 100% reflect both softness and built-in chip breaking.
- Why is stainless steel harder to machine than carbon steel?
- Two reasons: it work-hardens rapidly, so a cut that rubs rather than shears leaves a harder surface behind, and it conducts heat poorly, so heat concentrates at the cutting edge instead of being carried away by the chip. Ratings of 36–78% reflect that.
- What is the most difficult metal to machine?
- Of the materials on this site, Inconel 718 at 10% is the most difficult. Nickel superalloys combine severe work-hardening, poor thermal conductivity and abrasiveness, and they hold strength at the temperatures generated by cutting.
- Does a higher machinability rating mean a faster cutting speed?
- Broadly yes, but not proportionally. The rating is a ranking, not a speed multiplier. Use the cutting speed table on each material page as the starting point, and adjust for the insert grade, depth of cut, rigidity and coolant.
Related
Value Sources
References and calculation methods used for this page are listed below. Numbered markers connect table columns where present. A reference listing does not itself establish that every value has been independently checked.
| # | Source | Type | Revision / method |
|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | Machinability ratings compiled from published machinability charts | reference | n/a — industry comparison scale, no governing standard — source |
Data Sources
| Standard | Revision | What it covers on this page |
|---|---|---|
| Machinability rating, AISI 1112 = 100% | n/a — industry comparison scale with no single governing standard | all ratings, hardness values and roughing speeds on this page |
Verification scope
No page-specific independent source review is recorded here. The listed references and formulas explain the basis of the compilation; automated consistency checks do not verify the original sources or establish product conformity.
Ratings are comparative and vary by roughly ±10% between sources. They rank materials; they do not predict cutting speeds. Use the material data sheet for speeds.
Cite This Page
Read the source notes, calculation methods and verification scope above before reusing a value. To cite this page:
Each row in the tables above also has a permanent link — hover a row and use the # link to cite a single value rather than the whole page.