Deflection and bending stress for a simply supported or cantilever beam under a central point load or a uniform load.
Data verified 2026-09-29 · based on n/a — standard engineering relationships, no single governing revision
Simply supported, central point load: δ = P·L³ ÷ (48·E·I)
Simply supported, uniform load w: δ = 5·w·L⁴ ÷ (384·E·I)
Cantilever, end point load: δ = P·L³ ÷ (3·E·I) Cantilever, uniform: δ = w·L⁴ ÷ (8·E·I)
Maximum moment, simply supported central point load: M = P·L ÷ 4
Every one of these formulas contains L³. Double the span and the deflection goes up by a factor of eight, at the same load and the same section. This is why long spans drive section size so hard, and why a floor that feels solid at 12 ft can feel bouncy at 16 ft with nothing else changed.
The corollary is that adding depth is the cheapest way to control deflection — I goes with the cube of depth, so a modest increase in section depth buys a large reduction in sag. Adding width helps only linearly.
The cantilever case is worth noting separately: at the same load and span, a cantilever deflects 16 times as much as a simply supported beam (a factor of 48/3). Ends of beams and overhangs are always the softest part of a structure, which is why they feel springy.
Deflection limits are usually expressed as a fraction of span — L/360 for floors under live load, L/240 or L/180 for roofs, L/500 or tighter for precision machinery and for finishes that will crack. The calculator returns the ratio so you can compare directly against the governing limit.
This is an elastic, small-deflection calculation with a constant section. It does not cover large deflections, where the geometry changes enough that the linear formulas no longer hold; shear deflection, which matters for short deep beams; continuous or multi-span beams; or the effect of connections, which in timber and cold-formed steel often governs. For a structural design, use the span tables or the governing code rather than a formula.
Each data column on this page is tied to the source it came from. The numbers in square brackets correspond to the table headers above.
| # | Source | Type | Revision / method |
|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | ASME B1.1 — Unified Inch Screw Threads | standard | ASME B1.1-2019 — source |
| [2] | ASTM A615 — Deformed steel bars for concrete reinforcement | standard | ASTM A615/A615M-20 — source |
| [3] | ASTM E140 — Hardness Conversion Tables | standard | ASTM E140-12b — source |
| [4] | Values computed in your browser | derived | Evaluated locally from the formulas shown on the page. No data leaves the device. |
| [5] | ISO 4287 — Surface texture: Profile method | standard | ISO 4287:1997 — source |
| [6] | ISO 68-1 — Basic profile | standard | ISO 68-1:2023 — source |
| [7] | NFPA 70 NEC Table 310.16 | standard | NEC 2023 (NFPA 70-2023) — source |
| Standard | Revision | What it covers on this page |
|---|---|---|
| Formulas as shown on this page | n/a — standard engineering relationships, no single governing revision | every value this calculator produces |
Cross-checked against:
Derived values — the following values on this page are calculated, not taken directly from the standard:
| Value | How it is derived |
|---|---|
| All outputs | Computed in the browser from the formulas above. No data leaves the device. |
Outputs are computed from the formulas shown. Verify against the governing standard for design or acceptance work.
Every value on this page is traceable to the sources listed above. If you use the data in a document, paper or report, cite it as:
Each row in the tables above also has a permanent link — hover a row and use the # link to cite a single value rather than the whole page.
This site uses Google Analytics to count visits and see which pages are useful. It sets cookies only if you agree. See the privacy policy.